![]() ![]() ![]() The fact that the indictment or information is valid is no defense to a motion for a Bill of Particulars, US v. 1988), opinion withdrawn on rehearing, U.S. Once the bill is filed, great caution is necessary to insure the bill is not misleading as to hamper defendant’s preparation and cause unfair surprise. ![]() Thus, a Bill of Particulars not only provides the defendant with additional facts not set out in the indictment, but limits the Government’s proof as well. Once a Bill of Particulars has been provided by the Government, its proof must conform to that Bill. The test for granting a Bill of Particulars has been described as whether such information is necessary for the defendant to adequately prepare for trial and avoid surprise. However, such Bill of Particulars should be liberally construed. MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 7.06 WRIGHT, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: CRIMINAL § 129 at 281. Rule 7(f) F.R.Cr.P] the question of granting or denying a bill is still left to the trial court’s discretion. While “cause” need no longer be shown in order to obtain a Bill of Particulars, see Advisory Committee Note to FED. The Motion should cite the deficiencies of specific counts of the indictment and be accompanied by a brief in support thereof. The Motion for a Bill of Particulars must be filed within 10 days after arraignment and a court may, within its discretion, refuse to hear a tardy motion, MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE 465 US 936 3 WRIGHT, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: CRIMINAL § 129 at 281. This broader discovery function of the Bill of Particulars has been recognized by an increasing number of courts. 1971) it has the practical effect of disclosing information to the accused which is unavailable otherwise. While technically the Bill of Particulars is not a discovery device, Cooper v. The purpose of the Bill of Particulars is to provide the defendant with details of the alleged offense which are omitted from the pleading against him and which are necessary to enable a defendant to understand the charges against him (as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution) and to protect himself from double jeopardy (as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution). A court can bar the creditor/plaintiff from introducing evidence at trial in support of the account claimed when no Bill of Particulars is served.Home » Our Passion » Legal Resources » Pretrial Motions » BILL OF PARTICULARS R. If no response is received, immediately filed a Motion to Exclude Evidence per Code of Civil Procedure section 454. If a meet and confer letter is sent, a short time frame, such as 5 days, should be given to provide the Bill of Particulars. Although a meet and confer is not required for a Bill of Particulars, many judges except to see some sort of a meet and confer effort and will appreciate that debtor/defendant took the time to do so. A good practice is to send a meet and confer letter requesting the past due Bill of Particulars. If no response is timely received, the debtor can then file a Motion to Exclude all evidence of the debt owed. section 1013 - 15 days if the Demand was served by mail) to serve the defendant/debtor with the Bill of Particulars. Here is an example of a Demand for Particulars: The plaintiff/creditor has 10 days (per C.C.P. A Demand for Bill of Particulars must be in writing. (California Code of Civil Procedure section 454.) A good practice is to serve the Answer along with a Demand for Bill of Particulars, and any other discovery, such as Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, and Request for Production of Documents. A California defendant/debtor can serve a Demand for a Bill of Particulars at anytime after filing the Answer to the Complaint.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |